Quick Reminder

If my rejection of Intersectional Bullshit™ hurt your feelings, stop reading my blog. Clear your cache, avoid my space like the plague, ignore me. It will be better for all of us, trust me.

Because I am not confused, I am certain. It’s not that I “don’t understand” (HAHAHAHA, yeah right), and I won’t change my mind. There is absolutely no wiggle room. I will mock this bullshit, the other types of Snowflake Analysis, all the Special Snowflake “Feminism”(s) floating around and their fanatics a lot in the future. Sex-positives, Social Justice Warriors and the Trans* Cult too, that goes without saying.

If you post a rebuttal don’t expect me to read it, let alone reply. I will not “debate” you for the same reasons I will not debate MRAs, creationists and climate change deniers. My time is valuable.

Oh, SJWs: stop calling any feminist who isn’t white/Western a “womanist”. A lot of them want nothing to do with that bullshit ideology and are pretty angry about morons like you slapping the label on them to support your bullshit agendas. Likewise, stop calling lesbians/gays “queer”. A lot of us don’t call ourselves queer and want nothing to do with that cesspool of a community/movement – if we had a hammer, we’d smash it.

There, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Cheers!


Nuggets From The Tubes. Articles Of Interest.

Most of the videos hosted in the Cesspool of Youtube are just wasting space, but sometimes you stumble across interesting stuff. Attention: most of these videos aren’t safe for work.

Trafficking, Prostitution And Inequality [link]. (Length: 1 hour and 27 minutes) A public lecture by the brilliant Catharine A. MacKinnon. Very informative. It contains a lot of material to debunk the pro-prostitution arguments as well.

Against Pornography: The Feminism of Andrea Dworkin [link]. (Length: 47 minutes) A documentary about Andrea’s anti-porn activism. There are testimonies of prostitution survivors, and Andrea explains the importance of dissecting/understanding pornography for feminists as well as why the industry must be destroyed entirely. Warning: mentions of sexual torture/violence, including child abuse and incest.

The internal clitoris [link]. (Length: 3 minutes) Exactly what it sounds like.

Feminazi, anti-sex and NOW transhate [link]. (Length: 4 minutes) Very apt breakdown of the “radical feminists are ~transphobic~” bullshit. He also points out how validating deluded Trans* Snowflakes is not feminists’ responsibility.

I will rant about this is the future, but just to clarify I’m a strict materialist and as anti-trans as can be. That’s right, I said anti-trans, with absolutely no wiggle room. I don’t like the euphemism “trans-critical”. Capitulation doesn’t work anyway. Pro-woman and anti-trans, pro-lesbian and anti-Queer Alphabet Soup. Pro-radical, structural and class-based analysis and anti- snowflake-based analysis (post-modernism, ~*~intersectionality~*~, liberalism, etc). Which brings us to…

Intersectionality (amongst other things) is Bullshit [link]. Old but good post critical of that “theory”. She mentions that the term gets used to stifle dissent in faux-radical cricles and to silence women. Which is absolutely true.

Ignore and defend the male: the trap of intersectionality [link]. This post is in French, but translating it with Google Translate works just fine. A very detailed analysis of what is wrong with intersectionality, both in theory and in practice. I don’t agree with everything she says, (I think she is too charitable to the theory and its fanatics) but she makes a lot of great points.

I will post a complete, thorough debunking of this worthless garbage of a “theory” in the near future. Right now, I am too disgusted and enraged. Maybe some day I will be able to read/hear that word without greeting the nearest wall with a closed fist. In short: it’s misogynistic gaslighting. I don’t “agree” with any of it, in any way, shape or form. As a person who experiences several forms of domination, it does nothing for me other than waste my time and irritate me.

I will also denigrate sociobiology and bad science in the near future. There are many upcoming strident rants, indeed. Until the next time!


Special Announcement.

Women,

Best wishes.

Thank you for not breeding. Carry on being awesome.

Thank you for resisting misogynistic control and taking charge of your uterus. You did the right thing.

Yes, reproductive rights/health and being childfree are going to be recurring subjects of this blog.

Until the next time!

Click on the image to view the full-size version. It was designed and put together by me. Feel free to pass it around.


Stop Ventriloquism. Stop Appropriation.

((Insert political position that makes you piss your pants)) only care about ((insert problem / the issues of)) middle-class, white, straight, able-bodied, cis-gender, cis-sexual, cis-species, cis-corporeal, vanilla-privileged, non-otherkin people.” – Widespread poisoning the well tactic.

Dear morons who are quite in love with this cowardly tactic,

As a working-class, non-straight, disabled person I’m fucking sick and tired of middle-class/upper-class, straight, able-bodied, white people like you appropriating my outrage.

Seven things I want you to remember:

ONE. I can appreciate and learn from the essays, presentations and videos people create and distribute. They don’t have to address every single one of my problems for me to find them interesting / instructive / informative / worthwhile. Because whether I like it or not, not everything has to be ABOUT ME. Shocking, I know.

TWO. I would greatly appreciate if people didn’t bite off more than they can chew for the sake of “inclusiveness”. If you know nothing about my reality, don’t write from “my” perspective. Your ignorance (and more often than not, condescension) will show. Stick to the terrain you’re familiar with. I can offer additional information / correct you.

THREE. Liberals: no, radical analysis isn’t always perfect, but I’ll take it over your BULLSHIT any day. Thank you.

FOUR. And another thing. Liberals: I have no interest of being “included” or “represented” in your self-indulgent, absolutely non-threatening, status-quo-worshipping garbage. I’d prefer if you didn’t attempt to “address my concerns”. So you can stop pretending to care. Thank you.

FIVE. I don’t need any political group’s offer of “leadership”. For fuck’s sake, I’m not that fucking self-aggrandizing and narcissistic*. Besides, I’m an anarchist. I can’t take activist groups that have “leadership” positions seriously. Authoritarian tools will never dismantle authoritarian institutions. People who use said tools aren’t on my side, no matter how vocally they proclaim otherwise. If an activist group offered me a “leadership” position, I’d decline. It’s called “being consistent with one’s own views” and “practicing what one preaches”. I recommend both.

SIX. You don’t speak for me. Stop appropriating my voice.

SEVEN. Just because you and I share a condition (socioeconomic status, disability, etc.) doesn’t mean we’re friends, or that I share any of your positions. You don’t represent me. NOBODY REPRESENTS ME BUT ME.

There. Is there something about this that is hard to understand?

Important note: If I hear how evil, racist, imperialist, colonialist, classist, ableist, homophobic, lesbophobic, “essentialist” radical feminists are one more time, I’ll knock someone’s teeth off with a brick. And the next fuckhead who lectures me about how bourgeois and Eurocentric anarchism is will receive an elbow in the face, without shipping charges.

Note to racists: So, you say you genuinely care about the poor oppressed non-whites not being properly represented or “addressed” by Whitey? People of color see through your bullshit. A lot of them are also tired of being used as ammunition or shields in Internet pissing contests between fuckwads who don’t consider them human.

* If you only want something to do with certain groups if they give you leadership, cookies and a Special Oppressed Snowflake Card™, you are just one step above sub-human, regardless of how many marginalized groups you (claim to) belong to. There, I said it. Because it’s legal to disagree with you in the Internet.


Fork? What Fork?

Reader be warned! A poem this isn’t,
It’s a fucking abomination
A disjointed tract to decry
The absurdities of this nation:

The Internets,
Where civility and humility go die,
Where wilful ignorance and narcissism lie.

This is the age of stupidity,
Of not shaming people for their choices,
Or being one of those dreaded dissenting voices;
Of shallowness disguised as “positivity”.

If you chose to do it to yourself,
There’s nothing to argue:
All is good and well.

Anyone who tells you otherwise
Is just jealous of your specialness,
Of your freedom and originality
Of your inherent worth and individuality.

Shhhhh! But if you insult them enough times
Dissenters will just evaporate…
Into thin air.

Fork? What fork? I don’t see no goddamn fork in there! I have real choices. Choices I like! I am completely free and not influenced by external forces in any way whatsoever. Lose-lose situation? What a ridiculous notion. It was probably invented by some big meaniehead who hates people with subversive choices and imaginative self-expression. Why do some people have to be sooo negative? And why aren’t you worshipping me like a celebrity yet? And who is Morton?

- A typical fuckhead exhibiting symptoms of what I’ve described above. Sadly, this species is nowhere near endangered.

No, really


Upcoming Posts

Due to unforeseen circumstances, including spending several days in the hospital (it’s a long story), I haven’t had time to post in a while. But I have to spend a few more days resting, which means I’ve got plenty of time to type stuff nobody reads very important things. In no particular order:

So, I was taking a look at sci-fi book recs in Amazon, and I noticed how derivative, predictable and one-note most summaries are. I started to write down the clichés (plot devices, characters) that showed up more often, and ended up with a nifty list. If you liked “Talentless Writer’s Handbook: A Lexicon”, then you might like the upcoming “Talentless Writer’s Handbook – SF Edition”. In addition to listing shitty tropes, it also explains why they are shitty.

I was thinking about generic fantasy set in pseudo-medieval Europe (how incredibly inaccurate and anachronistic that version of medieval Europe is will be the subject of another rant post sometime), and how dull it is. I then started typing “How To Write Fantasy: A Guide”.

Back in May 12th, I went to the global protest thing. I GoogleFu-ed info about the protests in other cities. Tell you what, I’m tired of this movement being used as intellectual titillation for privileged people in general and white American hipsters in particular. So, I’m going to tell you about the revolution in my country, and in the comments you tell me about the revolution in yours if you want: information from insiders, for insiders.

Have I mentioned that I am a writer? Well, I am. I write mostly speculative fiction (sci-fi and horror). I’ll post about my works in progress in the near future. They have real characters, real plots, well-researched science (you see, I don’t think it’s necessary to insult the readers’ intelligence) and they are also inclusive (all of them have predominantly female casts, and several characters of color).

And recommendations. For folks interested in debunking the socio-biology field and biological / genetic determinism in general, I rec Biology as ideology by Richard Lewontin. It debunks a the status-quo-worshipping, “survival of the fittest” or “social Darwinism” rubbish that creeped into evolutionary biology a long time ago. Particularly interesting is the part in which the author explains how the environment (nutrition, hygiene, support) affects health / intelligence / life expectancy / survival a lot more than genes do.
I’m almost done reading Joanna Russ’ The Female Man. I rec it for anyone who hasn’t already read it.

Until the next time!


ATHEIST / SKEPTIC BINGO

After years lurking in the “skeptic” community, I have assembled the pretentious, bigotry-filled, repetitive-as-fuck diatribe literate and cultured Important Shit (TM) that is oh-so-objectively (Atheists don’t have biases!) discussed there. You will suffer like I’ve suffered… These fuckwads’ stupidity, self-indulgence and general grossness. In no particular order…

“ Blacks are less intelligent than whites. ”

Is an anti-choicer but criticizes Christian anti-choicers.

“ Gay people don’t contribute to society in any way. ”

“ Gay people can’t reproduce. ”

“ Gay people are an impediment to Evolution™. ”

“ If you don’t believe all the diatribe evo-psychos churn out, you’re worse than a creationist! “

Sneers at “intelligent design” but believes in “modules”, “hard-wiring”, “kin selection”, “sexual selection”, and epigenetics.

“ Craniometry isn’t racist. That’s just PC bullshit. ”

“ Women are evil whores. They don’t date ugly, smelly self-aggrandizing pieces of subhuman crud Nice Guys™ like ME. ”

“ Women are mean. They won’t pity-fuck me. ”

Sneers at “intelligent design” but believes human brains are sexually dimorphic.

Criticizes the Quran’s views on women but is a rape / domestic violence apologist.

Sees creationists as crackpots but believes in string theory.

Sneers at religious freaks but believes that anything can be explained with the word “quantum”.

Paints Christians as sexual hypocrites. Partakes in slut-shaming at every opportunity.

Thinks parapsychologists are crackpots, but is a firm believer in the magical, mystical, unlimited mysterious properties of black holes / stable wormholes.

Believes in white holes. See? He isn’t racist. See, see, SEE?

Parrots Ayn Rand’s verbal diarrhea.

Hates Gould and Lewontin with a passion. How dare they question the innate superiority of white males! PC Zombies!!!

“ But women are less intelligent / weaker than men!!! ”

“ Women have too much power in society. ”

Believes that atheists are superior to the rest of helpless, gullible sheep.

Critcizes Abrahamic religions for their endorsement of rigid hierarchies. Vocally worships said same rigid hierarchies. But it’s okay, because they are “wired-in”, determined, “selected for”, “hard-wired” and Explained By Science™!

Supports eugenics.

Feel free to distribute, popularize and use this bingo to troll neckbeards who identify as atheist / skeptic / “humanist” / whattheshitever. Cheers!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.